on the cover:
This first book-length collection of essays on Mormon literature discusses such classic narratives as Joseph Smith’s first vision and Parley P. Pratt’s Autobiography, more recent experiments such as Levi Peterson’s The Backslider and Terry Tempest Williams’s Refuge, and addresses the question of what constitutes Mormon aesthetics. In addition to describing the historical development of Mormon letters, essayists explore Mormon contributions to folklore, personal essay, home literature, novels, and historical tragedy. Among fifteen essays are: “Mormondom’s Lost Generation: The Novelists of the 1940s” by Edward A. Geary, “Literary Form and Historical Understanding: Joseph Smith’s First Vision” by Neal E. Lambert & Richard H. Cracroft, ” Juanita Brooks: The Mormon Historian as Tragedian” by Levi S. Peterson, “Beyond “Jack Fiction”: Recent Achievement in the Mormon Novel” by Eugene England, and “The Mormon Folklore: Cut from the Marrow of Everyday Experience” by William A. Wilson.
about the editors: Eugene England is past president of the Association for Mormon Letters and Professor of English at Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah. He is editor/co-editor of Harvest: Contemporary Mormon Poems and Bright Angels and Familiars: Contemporary Mormon Stories. Lavina Fielding Anderson, also past president of AML, is the former associate editor of Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, president of Editing, Inc., and editor of the Journal of Mormon History.
Tending the Garden:
Essays on Mormon Literature
Edited by Eugene England and Lavina Fielding Anderson
Salt Lake City 1996
Cover illustration: Red Wall by Royden Card, 1992,
acrylic on canvas
Cover design: Julie Easton
Printed on acid-free paper.
© 1996 Signature Books, Inc. All rights reserved.
Signature Books is a registered trademark of Signature Books, Inc.
Composed and printed in the United States of America.
99 98 97 96 6 5 4 3 2 1
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Tending the Garden : essays on Mormon literature / edited by
Eugene England and Lavina Fielding Anderson.
1. American literature—Mormon authors—History and criticism.
2. Mormons—United States—Intellectual life. 3. Mormons in
literature. I. England, Eugene. II. Anderson, Lavina Fielding.
PS1523.M66T46 1995 810.9’352283—dc20 94-48077 CIP
Preface [see below]
Introduction [see below]
Part 1. Historical and Theoretical Perspectives
01 – Mormon Storytellers, by Dale Morgan
02 – On Words and the Word of God: The Delusions of a Mormon Literature, by Karle Keller
03 – Mormondom’s Lost Generation: The Novelists of the 1940’s, by Edward A. Geary
04 – Toward A More Perfect Order Within: Being the Confessions of an Unregenerate But Not Unrepentant Mistruster of Mormon Literature Marden J. Clark
05 – To Tell and Hear Stories: Let the Stranger Say Bruce W. Jorgensen
06 – Just the Fiction, Ma’am Tory C. Anderson
Part 2. Criticism of Major Generes and Works
07 – Desirable Fruit: Book of Mormon Imagery Richard Dilworth Rust
08 – Literary Form and Historical Understanding: Joseph Smith’s First Vision Neal E. Lambert and Richard H. Cracroft
09 – The Autobiography of Parley P. Pratt: Some Literary, Historical, and Critical Reflections R. A. Christmas
10 – The Didactic Heresy as as Orthodox Tool: B. H. Roberts as Writer of Home Literature Richard H. Cracroft
11 – Juanita Brooks: The Mormon Historian as Tragedian Levi S. Peterson
12 – I, Eye, Aye: A Personal Essay on Personal Essays Mary Lythgoe Bradford
13 – Beyond “Jack Fiction”: Recent Achievement in the Mormon Novel Eugene England
14 – Mormon Foklore: Cut from the Marrow of Everyday Experience Wiliam A Wilson
15 – From Walden Pond to the Great Salt Lake: Econigraphy and Edgendered Species Acts in Walden and Refuge Cecilia Konchar Farr and Phillip A Snyder
Contributors [see below]
by Lavina Fielding Anderson
[p.vii]This First Volume of Critical Essays on Mormon Literature takes its place among earlier anthologies with such agricultural titles as Greening Wheat and Harvest. The metaphor of the title is deliberate. While I know no one who believes that creative literature springs up spontaneously in the footsteps of the muse, still, much of the labor of creative writing is invisible, while criticism looks like work. It is full of lists and footnotes. It is organized and linear. In short, it is a labor-intensive crop that has to be cultivated purposefully, and it plays a secondary, though vital nurturing role in preparing and maintaining the garden of primary, creative literature.
The project originated from a dual source. When Signature Books conceived an essay series in 1988, I was invited to propose and help edit a selection of literary criticism. The board of directors, of which I was and am a member, reviewed the proposal and suggested essays. They were polite but unenthusiastic: Were there really enough important critical essays available? We could all remember when there was barely an audience for Mormon creative works. Was it not slightly presumptuous to think that literary criticism could command a significant market?
Still, I continued to add to the tentative table of contents. Then Eugene England, who has taught Mormon literature at Brigham Young University since 1977 (a course in Mormon literary criticism is yet to be approved), independently proposed the idea of such an anthology to Signature in 1990. And finally Bill Mulder, Mormonism’s grand doyen of letters, read his “Telling It Slant: Aiming for Truth in Contemporary Mormon Literature” to a gathering of the [p.viii]Association for Mormon Letters on 20 September 1991, in which he called for just such a compilation.1
The first question, whether there were enough significant essays to compile, was easily answered. Even pared to the most essential, the compilation we first submitted would have run over 500 pages, and we had to pare again. We particularly regret the condensing of Gene England’s detailed and helpful critical bibliography of “Mormon Literature: Progress and Prospects,” from the 1930s on, which appears in full with photographs with the major Mormon writers in Mormon Americana, Vol. 2, edited by David J. Whittaker (Provo, UT: BYU Studies, 1995); and the omissions of Richard H. Cracroft’s “Attuning the Authentic Mormon Voice: Stemming the Sophie Tide in LDS Literature,” Sunstone 16 (Oct. 1992): 51-57 and Association for Mormon Letters Annual, 1994, 2vols. (Salt Lake City: AML, 1994), 1:34-43; Samuel W. Taylor’s spritely and acerbic analysis of the weaknesses of home literature, “Little Did She Realize: Writing for the Mormon Market,” first published in Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 4 (Autumn 1969): 33-39; the critical essays of Orson Scott Card, A Storyteller in Zion: Essays and Speeches (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1993); a number of the seminal essays written for or collected in Steven P. Sondrup, ed., Arts and Inspiration: Mormon Perspectives (Provo, UT: BYU Press, 1980); and the serious ethical work in criticism of Wayne C. Booth, particularly some of the concepts in The Company We Keep: An Ethics of Fiction (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), “Art and the Church: Or, ‘The Truths of Smoother,”‘ Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 13 (Winter 1980): 9-25, and “Why Do Mormon Writers Find It So Hard to Climb Parnassus?” Visiting Author Lecture, AML Annual (1996): 8-19. B. W. Jorgensen’s “To Tell and Hear Stories: Let the Stranger Say” is also condensed from the full version, published in the AML Annual I994 (Salt Lake City: AML, 1994), 1:19-33, and Sunstone 16 (Oct. 1992): 25-35. Indispensable resources in building a culture for the critical appraisal of Mormon literature are the readings, annual meetings, and proceedings of the Association for Mormon Letters, the critical introductions in the major anthologies cited in England’s introduction to this volume, and the entries on literary topics in the Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 4 vols. (New York: Macmillan, 1992).
We also call attention to three lacks that we trust will be remedied [p.ix]in the future. Our volume includes no critical essay about Mormon hymn texts as poetry, despite the significant place music holds in Mormon culture. Very little critical work has examined either texts or hymnody except for Jean Anne Waterstradt’s “In Hims of Praise: The Songs of Zion,” Association for Mormon Letters Annual, 1994 (Salt Lake City: AML, 1994), 1:190-95; Karen Lynn’s “Measuring the Achievement of the New LDS Hymnal,” Mormon Letters Annual, 1984 (Salt Lake City: AML, 1985), 124-28; and Michael Hicks’s AML award-winning Mormonism and Music (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1989).
Second, although numerous Mormon poets have received individual attention in reviews and at sessions of the Association for Mormon Letters and although book reviews of anthologies of Mormon poetry have noted trends, characteristics, and historical periods in Mormon poetry, the joyous labor of appraising past achievements in Mormon poetry has barely begun. Poems of the “home literature” movement in particular have yet to be evaluated and placed in context with the more technically sophisticated but frequently more ambiguous works of professionally trained poets. Ground-breaking work on Mormonism’s most famous poet is Maureen Ursenbach Beecher’s “Inadvertent Disclosure: Autobiography in the Poetry’ of Eliza R. Snow,” Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 23 (Spring 1990): 94-107, and reprinted in her Eliza and Her Sisters (Salt Lake City: Aspen Books, 1991), 57-72. The death in the summer of 1994 of Clinton F. Larson, long one of Mormonism’s most challenging and prolific poets, signals the need for a serious reappraisal of his work. Mormon poets who concentrate on Mormon themes have often received critical short shrift as “provincial”; surely Mormonism as a culture is sufficiently secure to appraise these works now without superciliousness. Meanwhile a concerted effort needs to be made to examine the work of a growing number of young Mormon poets who publish nationally on themes not explicitly Mormon.
The third area is that of Mormon theater. Considering the hearty and heady dramatic tradition that flourished in pioneer Utah’s isolated communities, the current dearth of Mormon plays is lamentable. The Correlation-driven decision in the late 1960s and early 1970s to eliminate dramatic departments from Mutual Improvement Associations and to limit local drama to an occasional stake dramatic [p.x]”activity” and an annual roadshow—if that—seems to have been part of a vicious spiral downward. With fewer people acting and attending plays, fewer aspiring playwrights wrote. With fewer original plays, there were fewer productions. With wards and stakes forbidden from sponsoring the touring commercial works of private playwrights, Mormon dramatists have been cut off from their natural audiences. BYU’s Department of Theatre and Film usually produces one or more Mormon plays per season, and Sunstone has consistently published a play every year or so; but relatively few plays have been able to achieve sufficient financial success to reward their makers. Perhaps the founding of Tuacahn, a center of the performing arts near St. George, Utah, in 1995 will help revive Mormon drama.
Even given this present dearth of creative work, critical literature on Mormon drama is shockingly scarce. Except for reviews of current plays in local newspapers, virtually nothing is available except for Orson Scott Card’s review, written under the pseudonym of Frederick Bliss and P. Q. Gump, “Mormon Shakespears [sic]: A Study of Contemporary Mormon Theatre,” Sunstone 1 (Spring 1976): 55-56; Eric Samuelsen’s, “Whither Mormon Drama: Look First to the Theater,” Annual of the Association for Mormon Letters, 1995: Papers from 1993-94 (Salt Lake City: Association for Mormon Letters, 1995), 1:137-44; Nola D. Smith’s “Madwomen in the Mormon Attic: A Feminist Reading of Saturday’s Warrior and Reunion, “Association for Mormon Letters Annual, 1994 (Salt Lake City: AML, 1994), 1:139-44, and “Polly and Katy: Mormon Feminists Take the Stage,” Annual of the Association for Mormon Letters, 1995 (Provo, UT: AML, 1995).
A critical examination of Mormon theater needs to begin, obviously, with a bibliography sufficiently eclectic to welcome those homemade hybrids, roadshows, and the steadily growing number of summer pageants without condescension. At the other end of the spectrum, the production of Tony Kushner’s Angels in America demands that the perimeters of bibliography be sufficiently broad to include works by non-Mormons in which Mormonism is a major element.
This preface may appropriately pay tribute to the work of the Association for Mormon Letters, an organization created twenty years ago (1976) to foster literary criticism. An overwhelming majority of papers published here had their first airing in an AML session. [p.xi]Many of the authors have also served as officers of this association. AML has given form, focus, and deadlines to the textual insights that flicker into being during readings or discussions but which may quickly flicker out again without ever finding permanent expression.
This close association between the Association for Mormon Letters and the core of Mormon literary criticism is not without a negative side. Its newsletter and proceedings circulate internationally; conferences and readings have taken place on both coasts and points in between. Still, writers who live and work primarily away from the Wasatch Front and who do not use explicitly Mormon themes or settings sometimes feel little connection to the community AML best represents. These problems will, we hope, also be addressed by new generations of writers and critics; and the creation of AML-LIST, an Internet forum, in the spring of 1995, is already attracting discussants both nationally and internationally.2
The first half of this book provides historically important surveys of Mormon literature and broad critical theories that explore criteria and aesthetics, while the second half focuses on major genres and works, including Mormon scriptures.
For many readers, these pages will be a convenient collection of old friends and familiar voices; but for others, it will be a door into a newly discovered garden. We hope the stay is a pleasant one. Those who love Mormon letters are a diverse and welcoming community. The metaphor of creative works flowering in spontaneous splendor while critics sweat away with hoes, sprinklers, and compost breaks down swiftly in reality. All are creators, all are cultivators—and of each others’ spirits as well as each others’ works.
1. This important essay has been published in the Association for Mormon Letters Annual, 1994 (Salt Lake City: Association for Mormon Letters, 1994): 1:216-26; Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 26 (Summer 1993): 155-69; see also “Essential Gestures: Craft and Calling in Contemporary Mormon Letters,” Weber Studies 10 (Fall 1993): 7-25.
2. 2009 addendum: To Join the AML list, send a blank email to: firstname.lastname@example.org. The Mormon Literature Database is presently located at http://mormonlit.lib.byu.edu/. See also the blog: http://www.blog.mormonletters.org.
One View of the Garden
[p.xiii]A distinguished literature has long been expected by Mormons, even prophesied by their leaders. As early as 1857, with the church less than thirty years old and most Mormons living at a subsistence level just ten years after the forced trek into the Great Basin wilderness, John Taylor, apostle and future church president, promised that “Zion will be far ahead of the outside world in everything pertaining to learning of every kind … God expects Zion to become the praise and glory of the whole earth, so that kings hearing of her fame will come and gaze upon her glory.”1 In 1888, as part of his effort to encourage creation of a native Utah literature that would be by Mormons, about Mormons, and for the edification of Mormons, Orson F. Whitney predicted, “We will yet have Miltons and Shakespeares of our own … In God’s name and by His help we will build up a literature whose top shall touch heaven, though its foundations may now be low in earth.”2
However, nearly ninety years later, in 1976, another apostle, Boyd K. Packer, quoted Whitney and expressed regret that “those foundations have been raised up very slowly. The greatest poems are not yet written … The greatest hymns and anthems of the Restoration are yet to be composed …We move forward much slower than need be.”3 The next year LDS church president Spencer W. Kimball, in an issue of the Ensign devoted to the arts, expressed similar disappointment but also continuing expectation:
For years I have been waiting for someone to do justice in recording [p.xiv]in song and story and painting and sculpture to the story of the Restoration, the reestablishment of the kingdom of God on earth, the struggles and frustrations; the apostasies and inner revolutions and counter-revolutions of those first decades; of the exodus; of the counter-reactions; of the transitions; of the persecution days; of the miracle man, Joseph Smith, of whom we sing “Oh, what rapture filled his bosom, For he saw the living God.”4
It is remarkable that what many see as the first major blossoming of a mature Mormon literature commenced about the time of these two addresses by Elder Packer and President Kimball. It is also remarkable that the issues they raised or implied about why the prophesied success had come so slowly have continued to be central to critical debates among Mormons about the nature and quality of their writers’ literary heritage and contemporary. achievement. Richard H. Cracroft—who could be called the father of modern Mormon literary studies for his pioneering work in the early 1970s in producing the first anthologies5 and starting the first Mormon literature classes—has strongly objected to the recent directions in most Mormon literature as being too imitative of flawed contemporary, critical and moral trends and thus untrue to Mormon traditions and values.6 In this concern, he echoes the earlier warning and counsel of Elder Packer to Mormon artists that too many “want to please the world” or to “be in style,” and so our artistic heritage grows “ever so gradually.” Elder Packer had pled, “Let the use of your gift be an expression of your devotion to Him who has given it to you.”7
At the same time, critics like Bruce W. Jorgensen have called for a Mormon literature that is distinguished not so much by specific doctrinal content and didactic purposes as by its powerfully conveyed love of the world God has given us and by its unusual hospitality to diversity of both content and style—thus showing devotion to Christ in manner and range as well as specific substance8 This stand seems to me consonant with President Kimball’s 1977 call for a literature that includes the full range of Mormon experience: “struggles and frustrations; apostasies and inner revolutions and counter-revolutions … counter-reactions … persecution days … miracle man … rapture.”9 Certainly one explanation for the general failure of Mormon literature to that point to fulfill such expectations was that it had remained too timid, too narrowly conventional. It had been satisfied [p.xv]with the safe middle ground of experience and with a non-risk-taking authorial voice, so it was not courageously dealing with the extremes of “apostasy” and “rapture” that President Kimball seems to be calling for.
The debate presently articulated most forcibly by Cracroft and Jorgensen dates back at least twenty years. In 1974, in the introduction to their landmark anthology, A Believing People, Cracroft and his co-editor Neal Lambert wrote, “Readers must never forget that for the Latter-day Saint, his church, as the Doctrine and Covenants declares, is ‘the only true and living church on the face of the whole earth,’ and a literature, or a criticism of a literature, which fails to examine Mormonism on these terms is not only unfair, it is futile.”10 That same year Karl Keller claimed that “more alarming than the paucity of qualified works of fiction in the Church is the lack of fictional exploration of the theology itself. Mormon fiction is by and large jack-fiction; it does not live by the principles of the Church.”11
Keller’s trenchant term, “jack-fiction,” captures the paradox at the heart of this debate. Everyone wants literature that is uniquely Mormon, even “orthodox”—but which is also skillful and artful; the problem is that focusing too much on either orthodoxy or art seems to destroy the other. “Jack-fiction” derives from “jack-Mormon,” in modern times the term for someone attached, even very strongly, to Mormon culture and sometimes quite “orthodox” in moral behavior, but not really conversant with or deeply committed to the theology nor an “active” participant at church. Most Mormon literature to 1974 had failed to be good literature—even, Keller says, that which had tried to be most orthodox-because it had been only superficially Mormon.
Keller ended his call for a genuinely faithful Mormon literature by predicting, “When someone becomes capable of creating imaginative worlds where Mormon theological principles are concretely true, then we will have a writer of the stature of Flannery O’Connor. Because she was a Catholic, she said, she could not afford to be less than a good artist.”12
To fulfill this hope, of course, Mormon writers need some theological literacy. B. H. Roberts,13 whom some consider Mormonism’s finest historian and theologian, provides an extensive overview in The Truth, The Way, The Life and a concise explication of what is [p.xvi]most dramatic and unusual in Mormon thought in Joseph Smith, the Prophet-Teacher. Others could be added: Joseph Smith, of course, especially the King Follett Discourse (uncreated being and godlike potential);14 Doctrine and Covenants 88 and 93 (God’s relation to nature and to human agency); 2 Nephi 2 (the doctrine of essential opposition in everything) and Alma 42 (how the atonement works) from the Book of Mormon; Brigham Young’s sermon, “The Organization and Development of Man” (our basic need for eternal progression);15 John A. Widtsoe, Joseph Fielding Smith, Hugh B. Brown, Spencer W. Kimball, Lowell Bennion, Truman Madsen, Margaret and Paul Toscano, Blake Ostler, Melodie Moench Charles, and many others.
Theological ideas can be, and sometimes have been, reduced to a formal creed that tempts Mormon writers toward didacticism, but they are also an extraordinarily rich resource for empowering the imaginative worlds of Mormon literature. This resource is multiplied by the dramatic and mythically potent Mormon history and the ethically challenging opportunities and demands of service, covenant-making, and charismatic experience in the Mormon lay church.
Mormon writers, then, certainly have at hand sufficient matter with which to produce a great literature. But does Mormonism also provide insight into the resources and limitations of the means of literature: language, form, style, genres, critical perspectives? From the beginning, Mormons have produced many of their writings, including some of their best, in forms that until fairly recently have been dismissively called subliterary: diaries, letters, hymns, sermons, histories, and personal essays. In the last twenty years, poststructuralism and various forms of ethical criticism have helped us see beyond such distinctions and provided tools for identifying and appreciating the different but equal values of many kinds of literature. In 1974 Cracroft and Lambert unapologetically filled half of their anthology with early Mormon work in unusual genres, much of which they had recovered through their own research, and they provided useful original attempts at evaluating these genres in their introductions and notes. Partly in response to that anthology came my own belated but grateful conversion from sole dependence on my formalist training, and I began to try to develop new tools of appreciation for my own heritage.16
[p.xvii]Mormon academic critics have been trained in and have made use of all the modern theoretical approaches, from the New Criticism of the 1940s and 1950s to the postmodernism that has developed since the late 1960s. No systematic criticism has emerged that successfully identifies Mormonism with any one theory of language or poetics. Mormon theology, in fact, encourages a remarkable and fruitful openness in relation to current controversies about the nature and power of language—and thus of human thought and literature. On the one hand, postmodernists find much that is congenial in the Mormon sense of an ongoing, continually developing universe in which God is a genuine and nonabsolute participant. In fact, God is himself in important ways a creature of language and its limitations. Doctrine and Covenants 1:24 informs us that God definitely speaks to us through his prophets but does so “in their weakness, after the manner of their language,” which seems consistent with contemporary ideas about how language functions relative to the world view and rhetorical resources of the speaker and the “discourse community.” This scripture confirms that there is no way to get “outside” of nature and language for an absolute and therefore universally compelling “meaning.” Doctrine and Covenants 93:24 further claims that “truth is knowledge of things as they are, and as they were, and as they are to come,” suggesting that truth is always relative to the knowers involved (including God), a position central to the thought of postmodern philosophers and literary critics.
On the other hand, in the King Follett Discourse, Joseph Smith refers to “chaotic matter—which is element and in which dwells all the glory.”17 I understand this to mean that God and humans can bring order from a pluralistic chaos that is potent, meaning that by its nature it is genuinely responsive to creative powers embodied in our minds and language. Because God created the world that we know from such a potent chaos and because his mind and ours can make connections to each other and to the world through the powers of language, we can create metaphors that not only closely imitate experience but also increase our ability to understand experience. Language is ultimately tragic, because it cannot perfectly embody or communicate reality, but we must respect what it can do.
A Mormon theory of language, then, can accede fully neither to a naive platonic realism nor to an absolute postmodern nominalism. [p.xviii]It is based in faith—faith that God is personal, embodied, creative, and language—using, closely related to us in mind and feelings, and sufficiently expressed in our organic, changing universe to be understood, at least in part, and to be trusted; faith that while language is limited and relative, it is not merely an ephemeral human creation nor an ultimately meaningless game to occupy us until the final doom but is rooted ontologically and shared by God.18
It seems important, when discussing Mormon literature, to remember that Mormonism begins with a book. The Book of Mormon has been vilified and laughed at by other Christians and ignored by literary scholars and critics, but over five million copies, in over eighty languages, are now published each year. It has changed the lives of millions of people. Most of them do not think of it as literature, but it has the verbal and narrative power, linguistic and historical complexity, ethical and philosophical weight, and mythic structure of a great epic.19 (See Richard D. Rust’s essay in this volume.)
Joseph Smith was involved as author or translator in many other works, many of them also of high literary merit. Doctrine and Covenants 19, 76, 88, and 121, and his accounts of his first vision have been appreciated as fine literature as well as scripture. (See Cracroft and Lambert’s essay in this volume.) His literate and personal letters and diaries have been definitively edited by Dean C. Jessee; unfortunately, most of his sermons, recorded from memory or in longhand, are too fragmentary to allow much development of literary scope, except for the remarkable King Follett Discourse, which is by far the most fully recorded and also the most doctrinally innovative and artistically impressive. Because of the advent of shorthand, we have a much fuller record of the unusually practical and personal tradition of pioneer orators influenced by Joseph Smith, especially the over 800 sermons of Brigham Young.
Early Mormons, like their mainly Puritan forebears, were both anxious about their salvation and moved to record their joy and success in finding it. In addition, Mormon theology inclined them to think of themselves as eternal, uncreated, and godlike beings, coming [p.xix]here to mortality from a premortal existence to continue working out their salvation in fear and trembling. They were encouraged by church practice and frontier American culture to bear witness both publicly and privately about their hardships, feelings, and spiritual experiences and thus to take an abiding interest in the formation of their own character; consequently, they produced, often at great effort and in amazing detail, diaries and personal reminiscences. Good examples, showing a wide range of sophistication and experiences, are (1) Wilford WoodrufFs nearly daily record of over sixty years, which provides both a rich source of ecclesiastical and cultural history and also intimate insights into the development of an apostle and church president; (2) Eliza R. Snow’s “Trail Diary,” our best source for the horrendous crossing from Nauvoo, Illinois, to Council Bluffs, Iowa, after the martyrdom of Joseph Smith and of the unique spiritual outpourings to the women there during the winter and spring of 1847; and (3) Mary Goble Pay’s reminiscence of the 1856 handcart tragedy, uniquely moving in its understated purity, which demonstrates how the character of an untrained narrator and powerful events honestly recorded can combine to produce great writing.20
Like diaries, letters provide the changing moral context of spontaneous, unrevised thought, day-by-day decision-making, and the consequences. Such directness often makes diaries and letters “truer” than the usual histories (which can be falsified by generalization) because we see in them what Stephen Vincent Benet called people’s “daily living and dying beneath the sun.”21
There were also some significant achievements in traditional literary forms in the first period. Eliza R. Snow was an accomplished versifier before she converted to Mormonism, but she turned her talent to long, didactic poems about Mormon history, leaders, and beliefs. She also produced some fine short lyrics and a number of hymns. The Poems were published in two volumes, 1856 and 1877, and the hymns are still a highly valued part of the Mormon hymnal, especially “O My Father,” which reveals the unique Mormon doctrine of a Heavenly Mother as divine partner to God the Father. Also during this period, W. W. Phelps and Parley P. Pratt wrote fine hymns, and John Lyon published The Harp of Zion: A Collection of Poems, Etc. Pratt also wrote the first Mormon fiction, as well as some [p.xx]of the most important and literate early tracts. His “Dialogue between Joseph Smith and the Devil,” first published in the New York Herald in January 1844, and reprinted in Cracroft and Lambert’s anthology, though mainly a didactic effort to improve the Mormon image and teach some doctrine to its gentile audience, is witty and imaginative in its setting, argument, and lively dialogue. His Autobiography, still in print today, has sections that are carefully shaped, self-conscious personal narratives much like good short stories; and some passages, such as his description of Joseph Smith rebuking the guards in Liberty Jail, rise to great eloquence. (See R. A. Christmas’s essay in this volume.)
Home Literature, 1880-1930
Although there is evidence that Mormon pioneers read fiction, even during their treks, church leaders in the first period recommended sermons and history because they dealt in “truth” and regularly denounced novel-reading as a waste of time and worse, the encouragement of “lies”—reservations that were understandable when popular cheap thrillers called “dime novels” flooded Utah after the railroad was built in 1869 and few classics were available inexpensively. In the 1880s some Mormon leaders began an important movement to solve these problems by encouraging and creating fiction, drama, poetry, and essays that explicitly set out to teach Mormon faith and doctrine.
The leader was Orson F. Whitney, popular poet, essayist, bishop of a Salt Lake City ward, and later an apostle, who in 1888 expressed hope for a fine and virtuous “home literature” and then worked to fulfill his own hope. He saw second-generation Mormon youth, often lacking a direct conversion experience and thus vulnerable to “the world,” as his primary audience. Other prominent leaders, such as B. H. Roberts of the First Council of the Seventy, Emmeline B. Wells, editor of the Woman’s Exponent and later general president of the Relief Society, and Brigham’s daughter Susa Young Gates, joined him. The result was a virtual flood of moralistic and faith-promoting stories and poems that became the staple of official church periodicals down to the present.
Poets like Josephine Spencer and Augusta Joyce Crocheron published didactic and narrative poems, Charlie Walker recited and [p.xxi]published some of his southern Utah folk poetry, and Whitney published hymns, lyric poetry, and a book-length poem, Elias: An Epic of the Ages (1904). Susa Young Gates published a fairly successful novel, John Stevens’ Courtship (1909), and B. H. Roberts wrote a novel, Corianton (1902), that was turned into a play performed on Broadway in New York. (See Cracroft’s essay in this volume.)
The most able, prolific, and influential of the early home literature writers was Nephi Anderson, and his most popular work was the novel Added Upon. First published in 1898, it was reprinted over forty times, most recently by Bookcraft in 1992, the only fiction from the period that is still read. Although Anderson himself recognized its limitations and revised it twice, the novel fulfills his own criterion that “a good story is artistic preaching.” The novel follows a small group of individuals, including two lovers, from the premortal existence through mortal life and into the postmortal spirit world. Versions of this formula have endured in musicals like Doug Stewart’s and Lex De Azevedo’s Saturday’s Warrior (1974) and Carol Lynn Pearson’s My Turn on Earth (1977).
A number of works of nonfiction written during the period, because of their intellectual and literary excellence as well as their prestigious authorship and faith-promoting power, have continued to be valued and carefully read: B. H. Roberts’s Joseph Smith, the Prophet-Teacher (1908; reprinted 1967) and his six-volume A Comprehensive History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (1930) dramatically but with unusual objectivity organized the thought of Joseph Smith and retold the history of Mormonism in its first century. James E. Talmage, an apostle, wrote The Articles of Faith (1899) and Jesus the Christ (1915), works that combine intellectual power with stately, moving personal testimony; both have continued constantly in print and justly achieved almost scriptural status among Latter-day Saints.
The forms and formulae of home literature that were developed in this second period still thrive, thanks to the encouragement of official Mormon publications (the Friend, New Era, and Ensign), the church-owned publisher, Deseret Book, and its cousin, Bookcraft, which aspires to wide and near-official acceptance by church leaders and general Mormon readership.
Richard H. Cracroft has led out in arguing that the future of [p.xxii]Mormon literature depends on writers learning from Nephi Anderson’s “steady progress from artless dogma to gently dogmatic art” to produce a steadily more sophisticated and artful work that is still, in its direct focus on Mormon moral and spiritual values, essentially didactic. However, others feel that primary emphasis on the didactic keeps Mormon literature from being either excellent artistically or powerful morally and spiritually. In debating the competing claims of instruction and delight in literature, Mormon voices are joining a conversation that began with the Roman writer Horace and has continued through such notable critics as Sir Philip Sidney, Samuel Johnson, Yvor Winters, and Wayne Booth. Most thinkers in this tradition have understood that the more directly literature teaches, the less delightful and persuasive it becomes. In contrast, a vivid and honest story, interesting and complex characters, powerful images, and affecting rhythms and sounds can often move the reader into new dimensions of moral understanding and religious experience. (See the essays of Karl Keller and Tory Anderson in this volume.)
The Lost Generation, 1930-70
In contrast to the “home” literature aimed directly at Utah Mormons, the 1930s and 1940s saw the first flowering of an artistically excellent Mormon literature that was published nationally and gained national recognition. But its authors’ reaction against the provinciality and moralism of Mormon home literature tended to mar their work with critical or patronizing attitudes that led many Mormons to reject it. Edward A. Geary compared them to America’s “lost generation” of Hemingway, Stein, and other post-World War I expatriates. (See his essay in this volume.) The main figures were Vardis Fisher, who won the Harper Prize in 1939 for Children of God: An American Epic, which covers most of nineteenth-century Mormon history; Maurine Whipple, who won the Houghton Mifflin Literary Prize in 1938 and published The Giant Joshua (1941), based on the settling of Utah’s Dixie; and Virginia Sorensen, who also first wrote a historical Mormon novel, A Little Lower Than the Angels (1942), but then did her best work set in the time (the early twentieth century) and place (Sanpete Valley) of her own youth. Among these works are what many consider the best Mormon novel, The Evening and the Morning (1949), [p.xxiii]and her set of personal essay-like autobiographical stories, Where Nothing Is Long Ago: Memories of a Mormon Childhood (1963).
Geary’s pioneering essay identified about twenty nationally published works by a dozen regional authors who responded to what they saw as cultural breakdown. Richard Cracroft has praised Samuel W. Taylor’s Heaven Knows Why (1948), of this period, as the best Mormon humorous novel22 and has also identified other more recent novelists who also seem to him to fit the “lost generation” characteristics.23 B. W. Jorgensen has traced “lost generation” qualities in expatriate Mormon short story writers of the period who continued publishing into the 1970s.24
It seems useful to identify two nonfiction writers as part of this literary period; though quite different from each other, they shared the “lost generation’s” impulse toward more realism in the Mormon past and were also, in different ways, rejected by Mormons. Fawn Brodie’s thoroughly researched No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith, the Mormon Prophet (1945) introduced the psychological approach she became famous for. Having more the strengths of a novel than of biography, her book was written with the perspective that Joseph Smith was a powerful charismatic genius but also a charlatan, an approach for which she was excommunicated. Juanita Brooks’s Mountain Meadows Massacre (1950) was the first work to deal thoroughly and openly with the most tragic event of Utah history. It became a model for the New Mormon History, a whole movement of less didactic biography and historiography by faithful Mormon scholars. Brooks was ostracized by many Mormons but, unlike Brodie, remained a devout Latter-day Saint and, as her biographer Levi S. Peterson has argued, provided an important moral, intellectual, and spiritual service for her community. (See his essay in this volume.)
Faithful Realism, 1960-present25
Since about 1960, overlapping with some of the major “lost generation” figures, an increasing number of Mormon writers have, I believe, been able to learn from both the achievements and limitations of previous periods and produce works that can both teach and delight, as the best literature always has. They are realistic and even [p.xxiv]critical about Mormon experience but profoundly faithful to the vision and concerns of the restored gospel of Jesus Christ.
Their spiritual father is Clinton F. Larson, who was influenced by the craftsmanship and the religious intensity of T. S. Eliot and other modern poets in the 1930s and 1940s, as well as the mentoring of Brewster Ghiselin, a fine young poet at the University of Utah. In the midst of this apprenticeship, Larson served as a Mormon missionary under the eloquent, urbane, and spiritually direct Hugh B. Brown, later an apostle. These influences helped him depart both from the didactic and inward-looking provinciality of the first 100 years of Mormon literature and the elitist, patronizing provinciality of his contemporaries in the “lost generation.” He began in the 1950s to write and, in the 1960s, regularly to publish a unique Mormon poetry of modernist sensibility and skill but also of informed and passionate faith. Grounded in Mormon theology, history, and contemporary. life and thought, able to both criticize and affirm, Larson was devoutly part of rather than standing apart from his Mormon people.
Larson also helped the new tradition of faithful and realistic Mormon literature along by founding the first Mormon scholarly and literary periodical, BYU Studies, in 1959 and contributing his poetry regularly there and to Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, founded in 1966. His colleagues at Brigham Young University (Edward L. Hart, Marden J. Clark, and John S. Harris) and Mormon poets elsewhere (Carol Lynn Pearson, Lewis Horne, and Emma Lou Thayne) developed in their own ways in the 1960s and 1970s; but all were influenced by Larson. This influence may not have been as direct as specific style or subject matter, but he had liberated them by being the first to create a poetry deeply grounded in Mormon theology and experience, yet responsive to personal vision and feelings rather than merely to didactic or institutional purposes.26
Younger poets in the 1980s and 1990s have come even more thoroughly under the influence of contemporary American and other poets; they have produced poetry that, in its challenges to traditional forms and methods as well as its interest in current issues like feminism, multiculturalism, and postmodernist anxiety about language itself, seems to some not Mormon at all, although many readers, in contrast, find that their poetry takes the faithful realism [p.xxv]Larson first created in interesting new directions valuable both to Mormons and others. Such skilled Mormon poets, appearing regularly in national periodicals, include Linda Sillitoe, Susan Elizabeth Howe, Lance Larsen, and Kathy Evans.27
Douglas Thayer and Donald R. Marshall, who were students and later teachers at Brigham Young University, became the first to explore Larson’s new directions for a Mormon literature in fiction. Departing from the mode of expatriate Mormon writers still publishing nationally into the 1970s, they began to write skillful stories that explored Mormon thought and culture in a critical but fundamentally affirmative way. Marshall published two collections of stories and sketches: The Rummage Sale: Collections and Recollections (1972) and Frost in the Orchard (1977). His technical experimentation ranges from stories based entirely on lists or letters to sophisticated work in point of view (“The Weekend”) and symbolism (“The Wheelbarrow”). Thayer began publishing stories in BYU Studies and Dialogue in the mid-1960s, and his influence has perhaps been wider and more lasting. According to a younger Mormon writer, John Bennion, who has published a fine collection that includes experimental contemporary styles and subjects, “Thayer taught us how to explore the interior life, with its conflicts of doubt and faith, goodness and evil, of a believing Mormon.”28
Conflict is, of course, the very essence of fiction, and contemporary Mormon writers have found how to reveal and explore the conflicts inherent in Mormonism’s complex theology and its rich history and cultural experience. Thayer’s Summer Fire (1983) examines the challenge and possibility of redemption in the conflict posed by an innocent and self-righteous Mormon youth’s exposure to evil on a Nevada hay ranch. His second collection, Mr. Wahlquist in Yellowstone and Other Stories (1989), both exploits and exposes the romantic fallacies in male response to the seductions of wilderness which have produced a conflict, even in Mormons, between heroic manhood and the values of family and community.29
Levi S. Peterson, who acknowledges his debt to Thayer for teaching him to write in a simple and direct style about Mormon experience, has produced two outstanding collections, The Canyons of Grace: Stories (1982) and Night Soil: New Stories (1990), as well as a novel which some consider the best yet by a Mormon, The Backslider [p.xxvi](1986).30 All of Peterson’s writings explore in some form the conflicts in Mormon experience and popular thought between the Old Testament Jehovah of rewards and punishments and the New Testament Christ of unconditional acceptance and redemptive love.
Mormon fiction of the past twenty years has most fully realized the hopes of Elder Packer, President Kimball, and many others for an excellent but genuinely and uniquely Mormon literature. Both its quantity and its quality have steadily increased. Dozens of skilled Mormon writers regularly employ a great variety of methods and perspectives. Those continuing or improving on the home literature tradition include Shirley Sealy, Jack Weyland, Brenton G. Yorgason and Blaine M. Yorgason, Carol Hoefling Morris, Susan Evans McCloud, and Gerald Lund. Others, who are publishing excellent work nationally, communicate some degree of expatriate feeling. They include Laura Kalpakian, Judith Freeman, and Walter Kirn. But there is another, quite large group of faithful Mormon writers of what I call “the new Mormon fiction”31 who are both publishing nationally and gaining a growing audience of appreciative Mormon readers. Good examples are Linda Sillitoe and Michael Fillerup, both of whom explore feminism and multicultural issues from a Mormon perspective; Lewis Horne and Neal Chandler, who live and write about Mormon life outside the Wasatch front; and Phyllis Barber and Margaret Blair Young, who have growing reputations for both their story collections and their novels.
Perhaps the most prolific and innovative among these faithful realists (certainly the most widely read and honored) is Orson Scott Card, who began as a Mormon playwright in the 1970s but then wrote traditional science fiction without Mormon reference and reached the very top of his field with Hugo and Nebula Awards two years running in 1986 and 1987. However, he turned back to openly Mormon works, beginning with a historical novel, A Woman of Destiny (1984; reprinted as Saints in 1988) and continuing with a fantasy series, The Tales of Alvin Maker (4 volumes to date, 1987-95), based on the life of Joseph Smith; straight-forward Mormon science fiction stories in The Folk of the Fringe (1989); a science fiction series, Homecoming (5 volumes, 1992-95), based on the Book of Mormon; and a novel of contemporary Mormon domestic and spiritual realism, Lost Boys (1992 ).32
[p.xxvii]Although fiction is the area where Mormons are just now best fulfilling the prophetic hopes for Mormon literature and beginning to have some impact on national and world literature, it seems to me that the personal essay has the greatest potential for making a uniquely valuable contribution both to Mormon cultural and religious life and to that of others. Our theological emphasis on life as a stage where the individual self is both tested and created and our history of close self-examination in journals, sermons, and testimony-bearing provide resources that have mainly been realized in sermons and autobiography but that increasingly find expression in powerful informal essays and personal and family oral storytelling.
Through the work of William A. (Bert) Wilson, the preeminent Mormon folklorist and one of the foremost and most innovative of American folklorists, we can not only appreciate Mormonism’s rich oral narratives and humor but also understand their continuing crucial role in expressing our basic values and concerns. (See his essay in this volume.) The revered Brigham Young University English professor P. A. Christensen produced two volumes of informal essays, All in a Teacher’s Day (1948) and Of a Number of Things (1962) and various other Mormons have written effective literary, religious, and historical essays with personal dimensions. However, it was Edward Geary, with “Goodbye to Poplarhaven” (Dialogue, Summer 1973), who first revealed to his own community the great potential of the Mormon personal essay as an art form.
Stimulated in part by Dialogue’s establishment in 1971 of a regular section, “Personal Voices,” and the example of Geary and others, writers developed this form rapidly. Personal essays also began to appear occasionally in BYU Studies, and often in new periodicals that started up in the 1970s: the Ensign, Exponent II, and Sunstone.33By the late 1970s and early 1980s, edited or individual collections were appearing and attracting some critical attention. (See Mary Bradford’s essay in this issue.)
By the mid-1980s some Mormon writers were extending the range of the personal essay form to consider such issues as feminism and ecology, to include diverse voices in the same essay, and to experiment with other elements usually confined to fiction. Some have found national publishers. Terry Tempest Williams’s Refuge: An Unnatural History of Family and Place (1991) received awards and [p.xxviii]excellent reviews nationally and was awarded the Association for Mormon Letters Prize in 1992 for the personal essay. (See Cecilia Konchar Farr’s and Phillip Snyder’s essay in this volume.) Phyllis Barber won both the 1991 Associated Writing Programs Award in “Creative Non-Fiction” and a 1993 Association for Mormon Letters award for How I Got Cultured: A Nevada Memoir, essentially a collection of avant-garde personal essays. Most recently, prize-winning poet Emma Lou Thayne and Pulitzer Prize winner social historian Laurel Thatcher Ulrich have combined their essays in a unique collection, All God’s Critters Got a Place in the Choir (1995).
Drama should be a prominent Mormon literary form, for some of the same theological, cultural, and historical reasons that explain the importance of the personal essay. However, despite strong support for popular dramatic productions beginning in Nauvoo and continuing in the Salt Lake Theatre of the later nineteenth century and the “roadshow” tradition in twentieth-century Mormon wards, it was not until the 1960s that there was much realistic drama written by Mormons about Mormon experience.34 The first were mainly “closet dramas,” such as Clinton F. Larson’s The Mantle of the Prophet, and musicals. By the late 1970s, however, fine Mormon dramas were being quite regularly written and produced at BYU. Of these probably the best single achievement is Robert Elliott’s Fires of the Mind, published in Sunstone’s first issue (Winter 1975, 23-93). However, the finest body of work is by Thomas F. Rogers, who has produced a number of plays of high quality, though I believe his best is still Huebener (1976, published in Rogers’s collection, God’s Fools, 1983).
James Arrington inaugurated a productive series of one-person plays in the late 1970s with his Here’s Brother Brigham and Farley Family Reunion, the latter being still regularly performed, available on video, and considered by some as perhaps the best of authentic Mormon drama. The most promising younger playwrights are Susan E. Howe (The Burdens of Earth and A Dream for Katy), Tim Slover (Dreambuilder and March Tale), Neil Labute (In the Company of Men and Sanguinarians), and Eric Samuelsen (Accommodations and Gadianton!).35
Some Mormon writers of the fourth period are achieving success, both locally and nationally, in high quality children’s and young adult literature. Fine examples of the former are Steve Wunderli’s Marty’s World, illustrated by Brent Watts (1986), Phyllis Barber’s Legs: The [p.xxix]Story of a Giraffe (1991), and Michael O. Tunnell’s three books, Chinook!, The Joke’s on George, and Beauty and the Beastly Children, which together won the AML prize for 1993. Examples of better quality books by Mormons for young adults are Donald R. Marshall, Enchantress of Crumbledown (1990); Ann Edwards Cannon, Amazing Gracie (1991); Louise Plummer, The Unlikely Romance of Kate Bjorkman (winner of the AML prize in 1995); and Dean Hughes, Jenny Hailer (1983) and Go to the Hoop! (1993).
The future of Mormon literature is potentially both bright and vexed. On the one hand, a number of new periodicals and presses,36 together with increasingly popular classes in Mormon literature at BYU, are rapidly expanding the audience for good Mormon literature. Good criticism, both theoretical and practical, is regularly fostered, especially by the Association for Mormon Letters,37 and there are regular book review columns38 and new electronic resources available to those interested in Mormon literature, including AML-List, a discussion group, and a website which includes examples of literature, author biographies, and bibliographies.39 With the recent successes of Orson Scott Card and Terry Tempest Williams, the national publishing market’s unaccountable resistance to Mormon writing may be lessening. Anne Perry, a British LDS convert who regularly publishes Victorian mysteries to critical acclaim, has moved from expressing her Mormon convictions only in the powerful underlying moral climate of her work to somewhat more open references to Mormonism (see Bethlehem Road, 1991); she is also under contract for a fantasy trilogy based on two women’s spiritual quests.
On the other hand, the potentially creative tension between the two poles of Mormons’ expectations about their literature-orthodox didacticism and faithful realism—seems at times to be breaking down into invidious judgments, name-calling, and divisions. The recent tendency toward mutually exclusive forums, periodicals, and presses, will, I fear, impede our progress toward becoming a rich, diverse, mutually tolerant literary community capable of cooperating in the artistic achievements that have been prophesied.
Mormon literature will always have a difficult burden—to describe a unique set of revealed truths and historical and continually vital religious experiences and to do so both honestly and artistically. We seem to understand this better about other art forms than about [p.xxx]literature, where the temptation is greatest to assume that a good “message” is enough. Most Mormons can see right away that a painting of Joseph Smith’s first vision done badly would demean the experience or that a clumsy or sentimental musical score on the suffering of Christ in Gethsemane would be a kind of blasphemy, but a “faith-building” story or one based on “real experience,” however badly written or merely sentimental in its appeal, is often received uncritically.
Faithful Latter-day Saints, as well as cultural Mormons, are developing the skill and courage to write well in all the genres. The challenge they face—which must be faced as well by their readers, both Mormons and others—is to unite the extremes of experience Brigham Young described: “We cannot obtain eternal life unless we actually know and comprehend by our experience the principle of good and the principle of evil, the light and the darkness, truth, virtue, and holiness, also vice, wickedness, and corruption.”40 To gain such comprehension, we must be willing, both as writers and readers, to do as Joseph Smith did—and called us to do: “Thy mind, … if thou wilt lead a soul unto salvation, must stretch as high as the utmost heavens, and search into and contemplate the darkest abyss, and the broad expanse of eternity.”41 A literature to match the high religious achievement of the restoration Joseph Smith began requires the breadth and the depth he achieved: literary skill, moral courage, lofty visions, generosity, and spiritual passion. Mormon writers, if they are true to their sacred and powerful art of language as well as their sacred and powerful religious heritage, can aspire, Elder Packer promised in 1976,42 to enjoy the promise by Christ to Joseph Smith: “Draw near unto me and I will draw near unto you … ask, and ye shall receive” (D&C 88:63).
3. Boyd K. Packer, “The Arts and the Spirit of the Lord,” 1976 Devotional [p.xxxi]Speeches of the Year (Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 1977), 268; reprinted in Steven P. Sondrup, ed., Arts and Inspiration: Mormon Perspectives (Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 1980), 5-6.
6. Cracroft, “Attuning the Authentic Mormon Voice: Stemming the Sophic Tide in LDS Literature,” Sunstone 16 (July 1993): 51-57; see also his review of Harvest: Contemporary Mormon Poems in BYU Studies 30 (Spring 1990): 119, 121-23.
13. Roberts’s comprehensive theology, The Truth, The Way, The Life was published in two editions in 1994, one edited by John Welch et al. (Provo, UT: BYU Studies) and one by Stan Larson (San Francisco: Smith Research Associates). See also Sterling M. McMurrin’s The Theological Foundations of the Mormon Religion (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1965) and Roberts’s Joseph Smith, the Prophet-Teacher (Princeton, NJ: LDS Deseret Club, 1965), with an introduction by McMurrin.
16. See Eugene England, “Great Books or True Religion? Defining the Mormon Scholar,” Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 9 (Winter 1974): 36-49; reprinted in Dialogues with Myself (Midvale, UT: Orion Books, 1984), 57-76.
18. For a discussion of the relations between religious thought and postmodern philosophy, see James E. Faulconer, “An Alternative to Traditional Criticism,” Proceedings of the Symposia of the Association for Mormon Letters, 1979-82 (Salt Lake City: AML, 1983), 111-24; and Faulconer, “Protestant and Jewish Styles of Criticism: Derrida and His Critics,” Literature and Belief 5 (1985): 45-66; for a critique of my earlier and more naive reflections on these matters, see Brian Evenson, “Chaotic Matter: Eugene England’s [p.xxxii]The Dawning of a Brighter Day,'” Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 27 (Winter 1994): 121-23.
19. See also John W. Welch, “Chiasmas in the Book of Mormon,” BYU Studies 10 (Fall 1969): 69-84; reprinted in Noel B. Reynolds, ed., Book of Mormon Authorship: New Light on Ancient Origins, Religious Studies Monograph Series, No. 7 (Provo, UT: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1982), 33-52; Bruce W. Jorgensen, “The Dark Way to the Tree: Typological Unity in the Book of Mormon,” in Literature of Belief: Sacred Scripture and Religious Experience, ed. Neal E. Lambert, Religious Studies Monograph Series, No. 5 (Provo, UT: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1981), 217-31. Richard Dilworth Rust’s book, tentatively titled “Designed for Our Day: The Book of Mormon as Literature,” has been accepted for publication in early 1997 by Deseret Book and FARMS.
20. Wilford Woodruff, Wilford Woodruff’s Journal, 1833-1898, typescript, ed. Scott G. Kenny, 9 vols. (Midvale, UT: Signature Books, 1983-85); Personal Writings of Eliza Roxcy Snow, ed. Maureen Ursenbach Beecher (Salt Lake City: University of Utah, 1995); Mary Goble Pay’s manuscript, in the Harold B. Lee Library, Brigham Young University, was published in full as “Death Strikes the Handcart Company,” in Cracroft and Lambert, A Believing People, 143-50.
21. The best collections of letters are Dean C. Jessee, ed., The Personal Writings of Joseph Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1984); Jessee, ed., Letters of Brigham Young to His Sons (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co. in collaboration with the Historical Department of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1974); Elizabeth Wood Kane (not a Mormon), Twelve Mormon Homes Visited in Succession on a Journey through Utah to Arizona (1874; Salt Lake City: Tanner Trust Fund, University of Utah Library, 1974); George S. Ellsworth, ed., Dear Ellen: Two Mormon Women and Their Letters (Salt Lake City: Tanner Trust Fund, University of Utah Library, 1974); and Constance L. Lieber and John Sillito, eds., Letters from Exile: The Correspondence of Martha Hughes Cannon and Angus M. Cannon, 1886-1889 (Salt Lake City: Signature Books in association with Smith Research Associates, 1989).
22. Richard H. Cracroft, “‘Freshet in the Dearth’: Samuel W. Taylor’s Heaven Knows Why and Mormon Humor,” Sunstone 5 (May-June 1980): 31-37. Heaven Knows Why was reprinted by Aspen Books in 1994. Two other important novels by Taylor are Family Kingdom (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1951) and Nightfall at Nauvoo (New York: Macmillan, 1971).
24. For the best review of such writers as Ray B. West, Jr, Wayne Carver, and David Wright (who though not an expatriate was “lost” to the Mormon literary community by his isolation and early death), see Bruce W. Jorgensen, [p.xxxiii]”A ‘Smaller Canvas’ of the Mormon Short Story since 1950,” Association for Mormon Letters Annual, 1983 (Salt Lake City: AML, 1984), 10-31, with its excellent bibliography and his “The Vocation of David Wright: An Essay in Analytic Biography,” Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 11 (Summer 1978): 38-52. See also his “Literature, Mormon Writers of: Short Stories,” Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 2:842-44.
25.Cracroft uses the term “faithful realism” to describe the recent group of Mormon novelists he most admires in his “Literature, Mormon Writers of: Novels,” Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 2:839. With his permission, I adopt it here to characterize the entire recent period of Mormon literature.
26. See Eugene England and Dennis Clark, eds., Harvest: Contemporary, Mormon Poems (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1989), “Notes on Poets,” for bibliographies of these poets, all of whom have continued publishing regularly, as well as of younger poets who developed in the 1980s and 1990s.
28. My notes on Bennion’s lecture at Brigham Young University (102 TNRB, 9:15 a.m., 11 Sept. 1991). Thayer’s first collection was Under the Cottonwoods and Other Mormon Stories (Provo, UT: Frankson Books, 1977). See also John Bennion, Breeding Leah and Other Stories (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1990). A story like Bennion’s “Dust” is both characteristically Mormon in its protagonist’s guilt-ridden response to the apocalyptic implications of his work on nerve gases and avant-garde in the stylistic disjunctions Bennion learned from his teacher Donald Barthelme. Other avant-garde Mormon writers include the postmodernist, occasionally minimalist, Darrell Spencer, who is publishing widely in prestigious magazines like Epoch and has two collections, Woman Packing a Pistol (Port Townsend, WA: Dragon Gate, 1987) and Our Secret’s Out (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1993), and Brian Evenson, who has appeared in The Quarterly and Nomad and has also published a collection of short stories, Altmann’s Tongue (New York: Knopf, 1994).
29. See Bruce W. Jorgensen, “Romantic Lyric Form and Western Mormon Experience in the Stories of Douglas Thayer,” Western American Literature 22 (Spring 1987): 43-47, and my “Douglas Thayer’s Mr. Wahlquist in Yellowstone: A Mormon’s Christian Response to Wilderness,” BYU Studies 34 (Fall 1994): 52-72. In my judgment, Thayer’s “The Redtail Hawk,” Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 4 (Autumn 1969): 83-94, reprinted in Mr. Wahlquist, is the finest Mormon story and one of the finest twentieth-century American stories, thanks to its sophisticated use of point of view and its profound theme.
30. See my “Wilderness as Salvation in Petersoh’s The Canyons of Grace,” Western American Literature 19 (Spring 1984): 17-28, my review of Night Soil, [p.xxxiv]Weber Studies 8 (Fall 1991): 99-100; and my essay, “Beyond ‘Jack Fiction,'” in this volume.
31. See my “The New Mormon Fiction” and the notes on contributors and the list of “Other Notable Mormon Stories and Collections” in my Bright Angels and Familiars: Contemporary Mormon Stories (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1992), xi-xx, 333-48.
32. See my discussion of Card in “Beyond ‘Jack Fiction‘” in this volume and my “Speaker for the Dead and the Different,” in This People, Summer 1993, 40-50.
33. Excellent early essays include Karl Keller’s “Every Soul Has Its South,” Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 1 (Summer 1966), and Carole C. Hansen’s “The Death of a Son,” ibid. 2 (Autumn 1967), but they did not become part of a continuing body of influential work. Geary collected his essays in Good-bye to Poplarhaven: Recollections of a Utah Boyhood (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1985). His The Proper Edge of the Sky: The High Plateau Country of Utah (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1992) is an experimental combination of personal reflection with natural and cultural history.
35. Brigham Young University’s Film and Theatre Department, with its willingness to sponsor playwriting classes and produce student and faculty works, has been an important outlet, although its works have not been readily exportable to a larger Mormon audience. In 1994-96, for example, Mormon-written and Mormon-produced plays on BYU boards have included Prodigals by BYU student Adam Boulter, which deals with the theme of free agency in a futuristic non-Mormon culture; student James Bell’s Prisoner, based on the Vietnam captivity of Lieutenant Gerald Coffee, which was selected nationally as the best new student play of 1994 and subsequently received a performance at the Kennedy Center; BYU professor Charles Whitman’s Montpelier Farewell (1995), which explores Mormon theology, and social issues in his hometown of Montpelier, Idaho, from the perspective of a non-Mormon family; student Adam Blackwell’s Blind Dates (1995), a play set in an Eastern city about the challenging social issue of date rape; and student Scott Livingston’s Free at Last (1996), a drama on the theme of blacks first receiving the Mormon priesthood, and most recently (June 1996) Eric Samuelsen’s historical drama, The Seating of Senator Smoot. Sunstone‘s commitment to publishing a Mormon play every year or so has reached the largest audience in permanent form. Recent examples are Accommodations by Eric Samuelsen (June 1994), about the conflicts within a Mormon family about caring for its aged members, and Bash: A Remembrance of Hatred and Longing, about violence against homosexual Mormons, by Neil LaBute (Dec. 1995).
[p.xxxv]36. In addition to the Friend and New Era (the Ensign stopped publishing fiction and poetry in the 1980s), short stories, personal essays, and poetry appear in the well-established unofficial journals such as BYU Studies, Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, Exponent II, and Sunstone, and in such newer periodicals as the refocused This People, Zarahemla: A Forum for Mormon Poetry, and Latter-day Digest. Wasatch Review lnternational, founded in 1992, concentrates on new fiction and poetry. Deseret Book, Bookcraft, and Covenant Communications continue to publish mainly didactic “home literature” and are thus reaching a wide audience of young readers, though they have also reached out toward faithful realism in the work of Carrol Hoefling Morris and Gerald Lund. Signature Books is the main publisher of the writers of the fourth period, with strong contributions from Aspen Books and an increasing number by national publishers.
37. This professional association, founded in 1976, sponsors an annual symposium in January and a conjoint session with the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association in October. Its proceedings contain many of the best essays in Mormon literary criticism, and its quarterly Newsletter includes short reviews of most new books of Mormon literature. It also encourages Mormon writers by sponsoring regular readings of new work in members’ homes and through its annual awards in the novel, short fiction, poetry, personal essay, and criticism. The association also awards honorary, life memberships, with a handsome plaque, to distinguished contributors to Mormon letters.
39. AML-List, sponsored by the Association for Mormon Letters can be accessed by sending a query to its moderator, Benson Parkinson (BYPARK-INSON@cc.weber.edu). The Mormon Literature Website (http://humanities.byu.edu/MLDB/mlithome.htm) is maintained by Gideon Burton, who is working, in cooperation with BYU Studies, to include and keep current a complete bibliography of Mormon literature.
40. Journal of Discourses, 7:237. Elsewhere Brigham Young insisted humans must “learn the nature of mankind, and to discern that divinity inherent in them … We should not only study good, and its effects upon our race, but also evil, and its consequences,” Discourses of Brigham Young (Salt Lake City: Deseret News Press, 1925), 394.
[p.213]LAVINA FIELDING ANDERSON is a past president of the Association for Mormon Letters (1981), former associate editor of Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, president of Eding, Inc., and currently editor of the Journal of Mormon History.
TORY C. ANDERSON is a founding editor and past publisher of Wasatch Review International: A Mormon Literary Journal, a biannual publication which he founded to encourage better literature by and about the Mormon culture. He lives in Provo, Utah, with his wife and three sons, and works as the manager of Technical Services at National Applied Computer Technologies in Orem, Utah. “Just the Fiction, Ma’am” was first published in Wasatch Review International 1, no. 2 (1992)l: 1-9.
MARY LYTHGOE BRADFORD, past editor (1978-83) of Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, is the author of a biography of Lowell L. Bennion. “I, Eye, Aye: A Personal Essay on Personal Essays” was first published in Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 11 (Summer 1979): 81-89 and reprinted in Personal Voices: A Celebration of Dialogue, ed. Mary L. Bradford (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1987), 1-11. Her personal essays were collected in Leaving Home: Personal Essays (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1987); she also edited Mormon Women Speak: A Collection of Essays (Salt Lake City: Olympus Publishing Co., 1982).
R. A. CHRISTMAS is president of Ecosys-Utah!, an environmental bio-tech company in Provo. He and wife, Carol Joyce Christmas, are the parents of eleven children. Christmas earned a Ph.D. in [p.214]medieval English literature at the University of Southern California in 1968. His poetry, fiction, and criticism on Mormon subjects have appeared for over thirty years in Dialogue, Sunstone, BYU Studies, Stories Southwest, Southern Review, and Western Humanities Review. “The Autobiography of Parley P. Pratt: Some Literary, Historical, and Critical Reflections” first appeared in Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 1 (Spring 1966): 33-43.
MARDEN J. CLARK is emeritus professor of English at Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, where he retired in 1981. He and his wife, Bessie Söderborg Clark, are the parents of six children. “Toward a More Perfect Order Within: Being the Confessions of an Unregenerate But Not Unrepentant Mistruster of Mormon Literature” was first presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Mormon Letters in 1981 and published in its Proceedings, 1979-82 (Salt Lake City: AML, 1982), and also in Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 16 (Winter 1983): 91-100 and in his collection, Liberating Form: Mormon Essays on Religion and Literature (Salt Lake City: Aspen Books, 1992). Among other works are a collection of poems, Moods: Of Late (Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 1979), and one of short stories, Morgan Triumphs (Salt Lake City: Orion Books, 1984).
RICHARD H. CRACROFT, a past president of the Association for Mormon Letters, is Professor of English at Brigham Young University, where he directs the Center for the Study of Christian Values in Literature and edits Literature and Belief. He is a former chair of the English department and former dean of BYU’s College of Humanities. He received his B.A. and M.A. degrees in English from the University of Utah and his Ph.D. in English from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He initiated, with Neal Lambert, BYU’s course “The Literature of the Latter-day Saints,” which he continues to teach; also with Lambert, he edited A Believing People: The Literature of the Latter-day Saints (Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 1974; reprinted: Salt Lake City, Bookcraft, 1979) and 22 Young Mormon Writers (Provo, UT: Communications Workshop, 1975), and has published widely in Mormon, Western, and American literature, in, among others, Modern Fiction Studies, the Mark Twain Journal, American Quarterly, Western American Literature, Encyclopedia of Mor-[p.215]monism, Utah Historical Quarterly, Ensign, New Era, Dialogue, and Sunstone. “The Didactic Heresy as Orthodox Tool: B. H. Roberts as Writer of Home Literature,” was presented at the Association for Mormon Letters annual meeting in Salt Lake City in 1979 and published in Proceedings: The Association for Mormon Letters, 1979-82 (Salt Lake City: AML, 1983): 32-44. He thanks Morgan Adair, his research assistant, for his help with this study. He and co-author Neal E. Lambert jointly read “Literary Form and and Historical Understanding: Joseph Smith’s First Vision” at the annual meeting of the Mormon History Association, May 1980, Palmyra, New York, published in the Journal of Mormon History 7 (1980): 31-42.
EUGENE ENGLAND, a past president of the Association for Mormon Letters, is Professor of English at Brigham Young University, where he has taught American literature, creative writing, and Mormon literature since 1977. He has published many critical essays on Mormon literature and four collections of essays on Mormon experience, the latest being Making Peace (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1995). He has edited two anthologies of Mormon literature: Harvest: Contemporary Mormon Poems (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1989) and Bright Angels and Familiars: Contemporary Mormon Stories (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1992). An earlier version of “Beyond Jack Fiction: Recent Achievement in the Mormon Novel” was published in BYU Studies 28 (Spring 1988): 110-20, and is reprinted by permission. His “Introduction: One View of the Garden” is adapted and condensed from a much longer, illustrated essay, with full bibliography, “Mormon Literature: Progress and Prospects,” in Mormon Americana: A Guide to Sources and Collections in the United States, ed. David J. Whittaker (Provo, UT: BYU Studies, 1995), 455-505, portions also reprinted by permission.
CECILIA KONCHAR FARR is Assistant Processor at the College of St. Catherine, a Catholic women’s college in St. Paul, Minnesota. A feminist critic, she teaches American literature and critical theory and has published on topics ranging from Herman Melville to mothering. She is presently at work on a book on feminism and academic freedom. She and Phillip A. Snyder are national co-directors of the Society for Studies in American Autobiography (American Literature [p.216]Association). Between them, she and her husband, Tracy, have two church callings, three mountain bikes, and two children. “From Walden Pond to the Great Salt Lake: Ecobiography and Engendered Species Acts in Walden and Refuge” was written and delivered with Phillip A. Snyder at the Association for Mormon Letters annual meeting at Westminster College, Salt Lake City, 23 January 1993, and was published in Annual of the Association for Mormon Letters, 1995: Papers from 1993-94 (Salt Lake City: AML, 1995) 214-25.
EDWARD A. GEARY, a past president of the Association for Mormon Letters, is Professor of English at Brigham Young University. He has published numerous articles on English and American literature, Mormon literature, and Utah history, and two books, Good-bye to Poplarhaven: Recollections of a Utah Boyhood (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1982) and The Proper Edge of the Sky: The High Plateau Country of Utah (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1992). “Mormondom’s Lost Generation: The Novelists of the 1940s” was read at the AML annual meeting, 8 October 1977, University of Utah, and published in BYU Studies 18 (Fall 1977): 89-98; reprinted by permission.
BRUCE W. JORGENSEN, a past president of the Association for Mormon Letters, has, since 1975, taught literature and writing at Brigham Young University, where he has served as section head of Creative Writing. He has published reviews, criticism, poetry, and fiction in Carolina Quarterly, Modern Fiction Studies, Western American Literature, Dialogue, Sunstone, the Ensign, Wasatch Review, and High Plains Literary Review. Among his honors are Woodrow Wilson and Danforth fellowships, the 1993 Short Story Award from the Utah Arts Council in 1993, and the 1994 Association for Mormon Letters, both for “Who Jane, Who Tarzan,” High Plains Literary Review 9 (1994): 6-30. “To Tell and Hear Stories: Let the Stranger Say” was delivered, in a briefer form, as the presidential address at the annual meeting of the Association for Mormon Letters, 26 January 1991, at Westminster College in Salt Lake City; longer versions were published in the AML Annual 1994 (Salt Lake City: AML, 1994), 1:19-33, with “Ancillary and Humble Annotations” by “N. Oman Claythorpe,” and also in Sunstone 16 (Oct. 1992): 25-35.
[p.217]KARL KELLER was raised in Manti, Utah, attended the University of Utah, and earned his Ph.D. at the University of Minnesota. He taught American literature at California State University at San Diego, publishing books on Robinson Jeffers, Edward Taylor, and Emily Dickinson. He died in 1985. His essay was first published in Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 4 (Autumn 1969): 1-20.
NEAL E. LAMBERT took his Ph.D. in American studies at the University of Utah and taught at Weber State College. Since 1966 he has been Professor of English at Brigham Young University, where he chaired American studies, was an associate academic vice president of the university, and, most recently, chaired the English department. With Richard H. Cracroft, he edited two anthologies of Mormon literature, A Believing People and 22 Young Mormon Writers, and edited Literature of Belief: Sacred Scripture and Religious Experience (Provo, UT: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1981). He has published numerous articles on Western American literature and Mormon literature in such journals as Western American Literature, Journal of Mormon History, Utah Historical Quarterly, and the New Era. He and his co-author Richard Cracroft jointly read “Literary Form and Historical Understanding: Joseph Smith’s First Vision” at the annual meeting of the Mormon History Association, May 1980, Palmyra, New York, published in the Journal of Mormon History 7 (1980): 31-42.
DALE L. MORGAN (1914-69), a native of Salt Lake City, graduated from the University of Utah where he wrote for its student literary publication, The Pen, and made as close friends Helen Zeese (Papanikolas), Ray B. West, Richard Scowcroft, and Fawn McKay (Brodie). Upon graduation, he began working for the Utah Historical Records Survey and the Federal Writers Project, was an advisor and contributor to Utah Historical Quarterly, and wrote or edited more than forty historical works. Because he was deaf, his correspondence is both voluminous and memorable. Bill Mulder remembers his oral communications as “an amazing stream of words in a high-pitched monotone in answer to written notes handed to him.” “Mormon Storytellers” first appeared in Rocky Mountain Review 7 (Fall 1942): 1, 3-7, and was reprinted in Rocky Mountain Reader, ed. Ray B. West, Jr. (New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., 1946), 404-13.
[p.218]LEVI S. PETERSON, a past president of the Association for Mormon Letters, chairs the English department at Weber State University in Ogden, Utah. He is the author of two collections of short stories, The Canyons of Grace (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1982) and Night Soil (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1990), a novel, The Backslider (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1986), and a biography, Juanita Brooks: Mormon Woman Historian (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1988). An early version of “Juanita Brooks: The Mormon Historian as Tragedian” was presented from the pulpit of the LDS Parowan Ward, 30 april 1976, and was published in the Journal of Mormon History 3 (1976): 47-54.
RICHARD DILWORTH RUST is a professor of English at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Among relevant publications are “‘All Things Which Have Been Given … Are the Typifying of Him’: Typology in the Book of Mormon,” in Literature of Belief: Sacred Scripture and Religious Experience, ed. Neal E. Lambert (Provo, UT: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1981): 233-43; “Poetry in the Book of Mormon” and “Book of Mormon Imagery,” in Rediscovering the Book of Mormon, ed. John L. Sorenson and Melvin J. Thorne (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1991): 100-13, 132-39; and “Book of Mormon Literature,” Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 4 vols. (New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1991): 1:181-85. An earlier version of “Desirable Fruit: Book of Mormon Imagery” was presented at the 1984 annual meeting of the Association for Mormon Letters under the title, “Book of Mormon Imagery,” and was published in Mormon Letters Annual 1984, ed. Steven P. Sondrup (Salt Lake City: AML, 1985), 77-85. In an expanded form, it will appear in Designed for Our Day: The Book of Mormon as Literature, forthcoming from Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies (FARMS) and Deseret Book.
PHILLIP A. SNYDER teaches English at Brigham Young University, specializing in autobiography and in twentieth-century British and American literature. He completed his Ph.D. at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and has published on Saul Bellow, Ralph Ellison, Langston Hughes, Marge Piercy, Alice Walker, Edward Lewis Wallant, and Thomas Wolfe. He has been named an Alcuin fellow at BYU and received the 1993 Student Alumni Association Teaching [p.219]Award. He and Cecilia Konchar Farr are national co-directors of the Society for Studies in American Autobiography (American Literature Association). Among recent works are a biographical and critical essay on Edward Lewis Wallant for the Dictionary of Literary Biography (#143, 1994) and “Artist-by-Artist (De)Construction: Mediated Testimony in Bellow’s ‘Zetland: By a Character Witness,'” Saul Bellow Journal (1993). Currently, he resides in Orem, Utah, with his wife, Lu Ann, and their three children. “From Walden Pond to the Great Salt Lake: Ecobiography and Engendered Species Acts in Walden and Refuge” was written and delivered with Cecilia Konchar Farr at the Association for Mormon Letters annual meeting at Westminster College, Salt Lake City, 23 January 1993, and was published in Annual of the Association for Mormon Letters, 1995: Papers from 1993-94 (Salt Lake City: AML, 1995), 214-25.
WILLIAM A. WILSON, a past president of the Association for Mormon Letters, directs the Charles Redd Center for Western Studies at Brigham Young University and is former director of the Folklore Program at Utah State University, where he developed the annual Fife Folklore Conference. Wilson has chaired the BYU English department, edited Western Folklore, been president of the of the Utah Folklore Society, been a member of the executive board of the American Folklore Society, and chaired the Folk Arts Panel of the National Endowment for the Arts. His research interests have taken him to Finland, to the American west, and to his own Mormon culture. He is author of the award-winning Folklore and Nationalism in Modern Finland (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1976) and is currently at work on a collection of personal narratives and a book on the Three Nephites. This paper was published first in BYU Studies 33 (Summer 1993): 522-40, and was reprinted in a lengthier version, with full bibliography and illustrations, as “Mormon Folklore,” Mormon Americana: A Guide to Sources and Collections in the United States, ed. David Whittaker (Provo, UT: BYU Studies, 1995), 437-54; reprinted by permission.